IELTS Essay To what extent agree or disagree type 2026 template and samples

IELTS Essay To what extent agree or disagree type 2026 template and samples:

Template:

INTRODUCTION

Few think that __________ __________. I majorly grant/ gainsay with the notion of......... and this essay will justify my stance with examples.

BODY PARAGRAPH 1 (Major belief)

One of the main crux for my stance is __________. As __________, __________.

For example, __________, which __________. In addition,......... If.....,......

BODY PARAGRAPH 2 (Minor side)

On minor note __________

When __________, __________. Due to it,.......,......

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, although __________, I largely agree/ disagree to __________ because __________.

Sample:

Essay Prompt (AI – NEW)

Artificial intelligence should be allowed to make important decisions without human involvement because machines are less biased than people.

To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Synonyms Bank (Strict Control)

artificial intelligence → automated systems / algorithmic technology / advanced computing

important decisions → critical judgements / high-stakes choices

human involvement → human oversight / manual intervention

machines → automated tools / digital systems

biased → prejudiced / emotionally influenced / subjective

people → individuals / decision-makers / society

Sample Answer (≈270 words)

Few think that automated systems ought to be permitted to handle critical judgements independently. I majorly grant with the notion of relying on algorithmic technology for such responsibilities, and this essay will justify my stance with examples.

One of the main crux for my stance is minimising subjective interference in high-stakes choices.

As advanced computing relies on data-driven patterns rather than emotions or personal preference, outcomes tend to be more consistent and impartial.

For example, automated assessment software used in banking institutions evaluates loan eligibility based on financial records alone, which reduces discrimination linked to social background or personal appearance. In addition, enhancing procedural fairness becomes possible when digital systems apply uniform criteria. If manual intervention dominates such processes, unconscious preferences may influence outcomes and distort justice. Another fundamental reason supporting this view is improving efficiency and accuracy in complex evaluations. As algorithm-based frameworks can process vast information instantly, they outperform individual decision-makers in scenarios involving speed and scale.

On minor note, recognising ethical accountability challenges limits full autonomy. When automated tools operate without supervision, moral responsibility becomes unclear in cases of failure. Due to it, assigning blame or correcting flawed outcomes may become difficult, particularly in legal or security-related contexts.

In conclusion, although accountability concerns remain valid, I largely agree to delegating critical judgements to automated systems because data-driven reasoning, operational consistency, and reduced emotional influence produce fairer and more reliable outcomes overall.

Essay Prompt (Agriculture – NEW)

Modern farming methods that rely heavily on technology are harming rural communities more than they are helping food production. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Synonyms Bank (Strict Control)

modern farming methods → industrial cultivation practices / advanced agricultural systems

rely heavily on technology → depend extensively on mechanisation / intensive technological dependence

harming → damaging / undermining / weakening

rural communities → farming populations / countryside settlements

helping → supporting / strengthening

food production → crop output / agricultural yield

Sample

Few think that industrial cultivation practices which depend extensively on mechanisation are undermining farming populations rather than strengthening crop output. I majorly grant with the notion of this concern, and this essay will justify my stance with examples.

One of the main crux for my stance is weakening local employment structures within countryside settlements. As advanced agricultural systems increasingly replace manual labour with automated machinery, traditional farming roles decline sharply.

For example, large-scale mechanised harvesting across parts of rural India has reduced seasonal employment for field workers, which has pushed many households toward financial instability. 

Another key justification lies in eroding social sustainability rather than strengthening agricultural yield. As intensive technological dependence prioritises efficiency over community welfare, long-established farming traditions lose relevance.

For instance, contract-based cultivation models often favour corporations over local growers, which weakens cooperative farming networks. If profit-driven output becomes the sole objective, long-term social cohesion within farming populations deteriorates.

On minor note, acknowledging productivity advantages challenges a fully negative stance.

When mechanisation is applied responsibly, harvest consistency improves and food shortages decline. Due to it, certain regions experience improved supply stability despite social drawbacks.

In conclusion, although industrial systems enhance agricultural yield in specific contexts, I largely agree to the view that excessive technological dependence damages farming populations because employment erosion and social imbalance outweigh short-term efficiency gains.

Essay Prompt (Environment)

Individual lifestyle changes are less effective in protecting the environment than government-led environmental policies. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Synonyms Bank (Strict Control)

individual lifestyle changes → personal habits / daily practices

protecting the environment → environmental preservation / ecological protection

government-led policies → state regulations / public-sector measures

effective → impactful / influential

Sample 

Few think that personal habits contribute more to environmental preservation than public-sector measures. I largely agree with the view that state regulations are more influential, and this essay will justify my stance with examples.

Starting with the main idea, enforcing large-scale regulations plays a decisive role in ecological protection. Owing to the legal authority governments possess, industries and transport systems can be controlled in a way individuals cannot achieve alone.

For instance, national emission limits imposed on factories have reduced air pollution levels across major cities in China over the past decade.

In addition, investing in sustainable infrastructure strengthens environmental outcomes. Because public funding supports renewable energy, waste management, and public transport, environmental benefits reach the entire population rather than a limited group. Another supporting point lies in ensuring compliance through legislation.Owing to penalties and monitoring systems, harmful practices such as illegal dumping and deforestation decline more rapidly. Because adherence to environmental laws is mandatory, ecological protection becomes consistent instead of optional.

On the contrary, recognising the contribution of personal responsibility presents a minor limitation.

If individuals reduce waste, conserve electricity, and adopt eco-friendly habits, environmental pressure gradually decreases.

In conclusion, although personal habits assist environmental preservation to some extent, I largely agree that government-led measures are more effective because large-scale enforcement and national planning deliver broader and faster ecological protection.